iSaveWeb - web saving tool

I downloaded this app today, and it it great for archiving/ viewing pages later. However, after just a few minutes I already notice a bug. The list of downloaded pages sometimes glitches and shows as empty when it isn't. This is annoying, as I can't view anything I need! This has only happened one, so far. Closing are relaunching the app fixes it, so it is only a minor bug. Three stars may be harsh just because of one bug, bit I found it within minutes of starting to use the app. Will update review after more use of the app, it looks promising :) Update1: It looks like the first bug I found is persistent :( it happens when switching from adding pages to viewing pages I think. I also found another bug, deleting two pages in quick succession (the second one before the first one is finished deleting, I presume) will crash the app. Also a minor bug, so no worries. Changed to 4 stars, been using the app for a while and it works great.

I use it to take website designs to show to clients at locations that don't have wifi access. Since I already have the entire websites on my hard drive,I don't bother with using WebCopier Pro to download the sites to my Mac. I just zip the site folder in the Finder and then upload the zip file to the iPad using the wireless upload function. It's a little cumbersome in that respect, having to use the desktop browser to upload the file by using a numeric IP address to access the iPad. I would prefer if they could use standard iTunes file sharing. Nevertheless, the uploaded zip reads instantly and includes everything including images, stylesheets and the Lightbox-style scripts that I use. I wasn't sure I could use the iPad to demonstrate sites since it doesn't have a complete file system, but with this app, I don't need a file system.

response required

I love this app, it works wonders for all that I need it to be used for. It never glitches for me, it works perfectly. I would definetly recomend it for it's simple interface. However, there are cheaper apps that allow you to have folders and save images and movies. I would love to see that happen to this one. Although whenever I get $2 I will go to download pro for videos, I'll still use this for text. EDIT: The gall of the devs, to make a new app that's faster and downloads more pages at once??? I paid $3 for this, with no real updates since I bought it, over half a year ago. Now you come out with this new app, and tell me to buy it for $5... I would love the new app, for it's features, do I hear a $2 in app purchase, perhaps? Does that not seem reasonable?

Saves individual web pages (& .pdf files) - load up your favorite pages when in WiFi HotSpot, read them later when your out and about avoiding using AT&T Edge or no internet. You can even 'photo' the web pages & email them too. PLEASE!!!! Update it in a Clever way to Web Crawl & save whole web sites as a subfolder containing the indivedual pages. The user should have the classic Depth Level choice (1 ~ 99 pages deep) and also control to: save only pages from the main host server, save only pages from the target domain name, or save all externally linked pages). The USA is way behind in cell phone tower technology & wireless internet is few and far between when you exit the major urban areas. iWebSave helps fix that problem, until the USA gets 4G WiMAX installed coast to coast (don't hold your breath). Great App! Thank You!

response required

If you're looking to buy the version that downloads multiple pages at once, and downloads faster, this is not it. Once you pay $2.99 for this one, it will tell you that you can get the bigger, better app for another $4.99. That version doesn't show in the app store, so if you want the "real" pro version, you're going to need to shell out a total of $7.98 and then have one useless app and one exactly like it but with more features. Hold off on your purchase until the developers come clean with a less confusing sales structure. If you pay for an app, you should get the good app, if not, the middle level purchase should be clearly identified as just that.