This app is exactly as advertised:
- Chronological Bible
- KJV
- Organized into 365 readings
It’s no frills. I’ll say it again, it does no more and no less than advertised. And, it’s FREE guys.
SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS
I suggest the developer add a couple enhancements.
- Provide an option to view an outline of the chronological order without the divisions into assigned reading days.
- It’s unnecessarily inconvenient that I’m always returned to the beginning of the list of days when i back up from a day into which i had drilled down. Please improve the app so that it returns the user to where they ppreviously were in the list when they click backwards to the list of days. For example, i would like it to RETURN me to the view of days 100 to 108 ( or whatever) where i had been before I had drilled down into one of those days.
RESPONSE TO THE LOW RATINGS THAT ARE MISLEADING
I don’t know the developer. Never met him. It just bothers me that some reviewers would discourage others from taking advantage of a GIFT that can help their knowledge of the Bible. (Because the developer’s provided it to the world for FREE, it is a gift to us. Be grateful that it’s free and it works.)
One of the reviewers ignorantly complains that the chronological order in this Bible doesn’t fully match the order in another he owns. The reviewer’s apparently unaware that there is often variation between chronologies because there is debate about when some events happened. Plus, there are different styles of chronologies. In sum, the reviewer’s complaint and low star rating were unwarranted.
One of the other reviewers also unjustly gave the app a low star rating. He complained that the audio feature had been dropped from this version. IMO, it would be okay to ask the developer to add it back in. But because the app description does NOT even imply that the audio feature is present, I consider the low rating to be unfair and misleading.
WRITING REVIEWS THAT ARE HELPFUL TO SHOPPERS
It’s misleading to shoppers when a review unjustly gives an app a low rating. Instead, reviews should rate an app on its degree of success at delivering as advertised.
The reviewer shouldn’t give an app low marks because it doesn’t already have features that they WISH for. Rather, the reviewer should give a positive suggestion that the developer consider enhancing the app with the features preferred by that reviewer.